Insta360

Insta360

Insta360
42 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Insta360
23
Sigma
100
Budget
Insta360
42
Sigma
99
Macro
Insta360
21
Sigma
99
Travel
Insta360
35
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Insta360
54
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Insta360
39
Sigma
87
Portrait
Insta360
64
Sigma
85
Professional
Insta360
47
Sigma
84
Street
Insta360
62
Sigma
80

Specifications

Insta360Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.94f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.943.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountInsta360 X4 AirSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Insta360

  • Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports