Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon
72 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 357 reviews

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is widely praised as a versatile, sharp, and reliable everyday zoom, with many users calling it their go-to lens for travel, portraits, and general photography. Image stabilization and autofocus are consistently highlighted as excellent, though some note it's not the sharpest L lens and a few report issues like barrel wobble, dust ingress, or soft focus. Mixed experiences with retailer service and repair costs also temper overall enthusiasm.

Pros
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Sharp image quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • Barrel wobble and rattle
  • Not the sharpest L lens
  • Soft focus at wide angles
  • Dust ingress under glass
  • Plastic build quality
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Versatility 30
👍 Image stabilization 20
👍 Autofocus performance 18
🤔 Build quality 15
👎 Barrel wobble 8

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
Canon
87
Landscape
Sony
82
Canon
95
Street
Sony
90
Canon
65
Budget
Sony
86
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Canon
75
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
84
Portrait
Sony
83
Canon
55
Professional
Sony
78
Canon
78
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
63

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mmCanon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm105 mm
Elements918
Groups814
Aspherical Elements44
ED Elements11
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.70 kg
Filter Thread41 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification0.215x0.24x★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm is €205 cheaper (2.1x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.477score per dollar
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM0.183score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm offers 2.6x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitVideo Cinema

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Better at:

Landscape

Also Consider