Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm

Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 lens is highly praised for its versatility, image quality, and value, especially as an all-around zoom for L-mount cameras like the Leica SL and Panasonic S series. Users consistently highlight its excellent stabilization, macro capabilities, and weather sealing, though some note it is not the sharpest at pixel level and the OIS switch can be soft. Overall, it is seen as a practical, lighter alternative to the Leica 24-90, with many calling it a go-to lens for both photo and video.

Pros
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Great macro capabilities
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Versatile 24-105mm focal range
  • Constant f/4 aperture
Cons
  • Not the sharpest at pixel level
  • Soft OIS switch
  • Slightly slower autofocus than kit lens
  • Heavy for some users
  • Large lens bag included
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Image stabilization 5
👍 Macro capability 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Weight and size 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4

Scores

Macro
Nikon
73
Panasonic
89
Budget
Nikon
84
Panasonic
79
Portrait
Nikon
81
Panasonic
80
Professional
Nikon
64
Panasonic
80
Landscape
Nikon
68
Panasonic
80
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Panasonic
79
Street
Nikon
75
Panasonic
68
Travel
Nikon
71
Panasonic
71
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Panasonic
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmPanasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm105 mm
Elements—16
Groups—13
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements24★
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon FL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg★1.18 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SAuto Focus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm300 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

BudgetStreet

Panasonic Lumix S S-R24105 105mm Better at:

MacroLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider