Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike
58 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 57 reviews

The Meike lenses are widely praised for delivering impressive sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value for money, often compared favorably to much more expensive native lenses. Users highlight solid build quality, smooth manual focus rings, and pleasing bokeh, though a small number note minor issues like aperture ring looseness or focus hunting in very low light. Overall, it's seen as a fantastic budget-friendly option for photographers seeking prime performance without breaking the bank.

Pros
  • Impressive sharpness for the price
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Aperture ring has slight play on some units
  • Autofocus can hunt in very low light
  • Lens hood attachment can feel stiff
  • Minimum focus distance is somewhat long
  • Some chromatic aberration in high contrast scenes
👍 Sharpness 32
👍 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Bokeh 14
🤔 Low light performance 10

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Scores

Budget
Meike
52
Nikon
83
Portrait
Meike
48
Nikon
79
Macro
Meike
55
Nikon
73
Street
Meike
55
Nikon
72
Video Cinema
Meike
48
Nikon
71
Travel
Meike
48
Nikon
68
Landscape
Meike
47
Nikon
65
Professional
Meike
47
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
Meike
39
Nikon
61

Specifications

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mmNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm85 mm
Elements11—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements22
CoatingMultilayered CoatingsSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★7
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight0.30 kg★0.48 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAF-S
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm380 mm★

Pros & Cons

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm is €255 cheaper (2.4x less).

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm0.314score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.200score per dollar

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm offers 1.6x better value for money

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 20 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider