OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO
OM System
64 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Nikon
88 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Street
Macro
Video Cinema
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO | Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 10 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | ZERO coating | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Nikon F |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.76 kg | 0.48 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual VCM | AF-S |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 700 mm | 380 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.21x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
- Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
Pricing
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO0.036score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.200score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 5.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
