Sigma 49B969

Sigma 49B969

Sigma
60 Overall Score
vs
spovan HPL-N-2

spovan HPL-N-2

spovan
39 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
80
spovan
59
Macro
Sigma
71
spovan
26
Professional
Sigma
69
spovan
46
Street
Sigma
60
spovan
62
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
spovan
51
Budget
Sigma
55
spovan
44
Landscape
Sigma
52
spovan
33
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
spovan
48
Travel
Sigma
34
spovan
45

Specifications

Sigma 49B969spovan HPL-N-2
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min20 mm0 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm0 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating, Nano Porous Coating (NPC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2
Min Aperturef/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight4.13 kg0.05 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm
Max Magnification1:6.67

Pros & Cons

Sigma 49B969

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

spovan HPL-N-2

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 49B969

Scores 60 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 49B969 Better at:

MacroBudgetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

spovan HPL-N-2 Better at:

Travel