Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
75 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN42.5mm F1.7M II 42mm

Yongnuo YN42.5mm F1.7M II 42mm

Yongnuo
35 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
82
Yongnuo
39
Professional
Sigma
77
Yongnuo
40
Video Cinema
Sigma
75
Yongnuo
39
Landscape
Sigma
72
Yongnuo
36
Budget
Sigma
71
Yongnuo
42
Street
Sigma
70
Yongnuo
53
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
65
Yongnuo
45
Travel
Sigma
59
Yongnuo
42
Portrait
Sigma
58
Yongnuo
31

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mmYongnuo YN42.5mm F1.7M II 42mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm42 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm42 mm
Elements169
Groups138
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements5★—
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMultilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/22
Min Aperturef/1.4f/1.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-C★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg0.15 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorSTM stepper motor★
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification1:10★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Yongnuo YN42.5mm F1.7M II 42mm

  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports