Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
73 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

78 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Tamron 16-300mm lens is praised for its incredible versatility, combining wide-angle, macro, and telephoto capabilities in a compact package. Users highlight its convenience for travel and hiking, allowing them to capture a wide range of subjects without changing lenses. However, some reviewers note compromises in image quality, including softness at long focal lengths and chromatic aberration, which can often be corrected in post-processing. Build quality is generally considered good, though a few users mention zoom creep and autofocus inconsistencies.

Pros
  • Incredible zoom range (16-300mm)
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent versatility for travel
  • Good macro capability
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Softness at long focal lengths
  • Chromatic aberration (fringing)
  • Zoom creep when held vertically
  • Autofocus inconsistencies in low light
  • Heavy weight for some users
👍 Versatility 6
🤔 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👎 Chromatic aberration 3
👎 Zoom creep 2
🤔 Autofocus performance 3

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

82 out of 100 high confidence 117 reviews

The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS lens is widely praised as an excellent all-in-one travel and walkaround lens for APS-C E-mount cameras. Users consistently highlight its sharpness, compact size, light weight, and versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range. While many note it is not ideal for low light and some report significant vignetting at the wide end, the overall sentiment is very positive, with most considering it a great value kit lens upgrade.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range
  • Effective optical image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Significant vignetting at 18mm wide end
  • Not ideal for low light photography
  • Variable aperture limits brightness at telephoto
  • Some copies may have quality control issues
  • Slight autofocus lag compared to premium lenses
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Value for money 18
👎 Vignetting 6
👎 Low light performance 10
👍 Zoom range 25

Scores

Budget
Tamron
80
Sony
100
Portrait
Tamron
77
Sony
88
Street
Tamron
65
Sony
87
Travel
Tamron
67
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
58
Sony
84
Video Cinema
Tamron
67
Sony
83
Professional
Tamron
60
Sony
73
Landscape
Tamron
62
Sony
73
Macro
Tamron
69
Sony
67

Specifications

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm135 mm
Elements1616
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
Coatingmultiple layers of coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-6.33.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.54 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypePiezo DriveLinear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:2.9★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm is €122 cheaper (1.3x less).

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider