Sigma 883101 18mm

Sigma 883101 18mm

Sigma
71 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
57
Nikon
95
Portrait
Sigma
70
Nikon
89
Street
Sigma
65
Nikon
86
Budget
Sigma
74
Nikon
86
Macro
Sigma
70
Nikon
85
Landscape
Sigma
58
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
62
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
59
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
64
Nikon
75

Specifications

Sigma 883101 18mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.47 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicromotor-type AF motorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:2.91:5.26

Pros & Cons

Sigma 883101 18mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports