Nikon 2186

Nikon 2186

Nikon
51 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
93 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
49
Tamron
89
Budget
Nikon
43
Tamron
88
Portrait
Nikon
37
Tamron
87
Video Cinema
Nikon
46
Tamron
86
Macro
Nikon
46
Tamron
84
Landscape
Nikon
46
Tamron
77
Street
Nikon
38
Tamron
76
Travel
Nikon
35
Tamron
72
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
44
Tamron
69

Specifications

Nikon 2186Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min300 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm75 mm
Elements1117
Groups815
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements32
CoatingNano Crystal & Super Integrated CoatingsFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight2.90 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorVXD
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance2.20 m180 mm
Max Magnification1:6.251:2.7

Pros & Cons

Nikon 2186

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

Nikon 2186

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider