TTArtisan 40mm f/2.8 Macro 40mm

TTArtisan 40mm f/2.8 Macro 40mm

TTArtisan
54 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
TTArtisan
66
Panasonic
96
Budget
TTArtisan
45
Panasonic
92
Landscape
TTArtisan
33
Panasonic
90
Travel
TTArtisan
34
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
33
Panasonic
86
Professional
TTArtisan
35
Panasonic
86
Portrait
TTArtisan
44
Panasonic
84
Street
TTArtisan
40
Panasonic
83
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
27
Panasonic
82

Specifications

TTArtisan 40mm f/2.8 Macro 40mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min40 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm200 mm
Elements817
Groups713
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements24
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades119
Build
MountFujifilm XL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm140 mm
Max Magnification1:10.5x

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan 40mm f/2.8 Macro 40mm

  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (65th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

TTArtisan 40mm f/2.8 Macro 40mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider