Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike
65 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

This compact 220-degree circular fisheye lens has impressed users with its solid all-metal build, sharp optics, and excellent value for the price. Despite its tiny size that fits in a pocket, it delivers dramatic perspectives ideal for creative and night-sky photography. Some minor drawbacks include a tight mount on Micro Four Thirds bodies and a front cap that could be better, but overall it is praised as a fun and affordable super fisheye.

Pros
  • All-metal build
  • Sharp optics
  • Compact and pocketable
  • Excellent value for price
  • Creates dramatic perspectives
Cons
  • Tight fit on camera body
  • Mediocre front lens cap
  • No firm grip surface for mounting
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Compactness 3
👎 Mounting difficulty 1
👎 Lens cap quality 2

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Meike
57
Tamron
95
Macro
Meike
71
Tamron
91
Landscape
Meike
39
Tamron
86
Portrait
Meike
69
Tamron
85
Wildlife Sports
Meike
36
Tamron
85
Professional
Meike
55
Tamron
84
Video Cinema
Meike
56
Tamron
82
Travel
Meike
47
Tamron
81
Street
Meike
64
Tamron
81

Specifications

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min4 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max4 mm300 mm
Elements1020
Groups713
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coatingmulti-layer nano-coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.19 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread61 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance95 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm is €704 cheaper (6.5x less).

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm0.504score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.120score per dollar

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm offers 4.2x better value for money

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider