GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001
GoPro
82 Overall Score
vs
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Travel
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Specifications
| GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 | Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | prime |
| Focal Length Min | — | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 10 |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | hydrophobic lens coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/0 | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | f/0 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | GoPro HERO Black Mount | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.10 kg | 0.09 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 105 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Hyper Sonic AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 875 mm★ |
Pros & Cons
GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001
- Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-0010.709score per dollar
vs
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.327score per dollar
GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001
Scores 82 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 19 specs.
