Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

Audio-Technica
31 Overall Score
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Audio-Technica
16
JLab
84
Calls
Audio-Technica
12
JLab
83
Travel
Audio-Technica
19
JLab
82
Commute
Audio-Technica
18
JLab
81
Budget
Audio-Technica
41
JLab
77
Fitness
Audio-Technica
21
JLab
76
Music
Audio-Technica
20
JLab
69

Specifications

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PLJLab Jbuds Pods ANC
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-tipstem
Ear TipsS, M, L
Weight0.02 kg0.12 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size11 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance20 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs
Charge Time0.16699999570846558 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery56 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant
Touch Controls
AppJlab App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP55

Pros & Cons

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

Winner: JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 34 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness