CCA CRA PRO

CCA CRA PRO

CCA
41 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

CCA CRA PRO

78 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The CCA CRA+ delivers impressive sound quality for its budget price, with many users praising its clarity and bass-heavy tuning. However, several reviewers noted fit issues with the ear hooks and ear tips, and one reported a persistent clicking noise during use. Overall, it's a solid value for bass lovers and casual listeners, but may not suit those seeking a neutral or technical sound.

Pros
  • Impressive sound quality for the price
  • Crystal clear audio clarity
  • Great bass-heavy tuning for bass lovers
  • Comfortable fit with foam tips
  • Detachable cable for easy replacement
Cons
  • Fit issues with ear hooks and ear tips
  • Persistent clicking noise reported
  • Loose ear cuff on some units
  • Bass bleed may bother some listeners
  • Not suitable for neutral sound seekers
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Value for money 6
🤔 Fit and comfort 5
👍 Bass performance 4
🤔 Build quality 3
👍 Cable quality 2

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Budget
CCA
56
Technics
99
Travel
CCA
26
Technics
95
Calls
CCA
18
Technics
93
Commute
CCA
26
Technics
90
Music
CCA
37
Technics
90
Gaming
CCA
36
Technics
88
Fitness
CCA
31
Technics
79

Specifications

CCA CRA PROTechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hooktrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, L5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.05 kg0.05 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size—10 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—40 kHz★
Impedance23 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity107 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
CodecsCCA CRA PRO in Ear Monitors, IEMs for Gaming, Ultra-Thin DLC Diaphragm Dynamic Driver Wired Gaming Earbuds, Deep Bass Clear Sound Ear Buds IEM Headphones, in Ears for Singers (Silver, Without Mic)AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector3.5mmBluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—8 hrs★
Charge Time—2.5 hrs★
Fast Charging—15 min. for 90 min. playback
Charging—USB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—28 hrs★
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✗✓★
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls—✓★
AppAndroidAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode✓★✗
Bone Conduction—✗
Water Resistance—IPX4

Pros & Cons

CCA CRA PRO

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Strong sound (65th percentile)
  • Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Pricing

CCA CRA PRO

Technics EAH-AZ100

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider