JVC HAFX38MA

JVC HAFX38MA

JVC
46 Overall Score
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
JVC
51
TOZO
79
Gaming
JVC
31
TOZO
79
Travel
JVC
28
TOZO
78
Fitness
JVC
42
TOZO
72
Calls
JVC
26
TOZO
70
Commute
JVC
25
TOZO
70
Music
JVC
26
TOZO
68

Specifications

JVC HAFX38MATOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing StyleRounded toetrue wireless
Ear TipssMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX5

Pros & Cons

JVC HAFX38MA

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness