QJF M126 vs Technics EAH-AZ80
QJF M126
Technics EAH-AZ80
What Buyers Say
QJF M126
Users generally appreciate the comfort and fit of these earbuds, especially for sleep or work use where only one bud is worn at a time. However, several reviews mention inconsistent battery life, with some reporting only 3-4 hours, and a few units have buzzing or rattling noises. Pairing issues and mediocre sound quality are also noted, but the noise cancellation and automatic call transfer are praised.
Pros
- Comfortable fit
- Good noise cancellation
- Clear call quality
- Automatic style transfer
- Decent battery life for case
Cons
- Inconsistent battery life (3-4 hrs)
- Buzzing or rattling noises in some units
- Pairing difficulties
- Mediocre sound quality
- Unhelpful instructions
Technics EAH-AZ80
The Technics EAH-AZ10 earbuds receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their exceptional sound quality, featuring clear separation, wide soundstage, and natural tuning that rivals higher-end models. Users praise the comfortable and secure fit, effective noise cancellation that doesn't muddy the audio, and impressive battery life lasting up to 7 hours. However, a few critical reviews highlight poor touch controls that are unresponsive, and one user experienced a significant volume imbalance after 1.5 years, with the company offering only a 10% discount on a replacement rather than a fix. Overall, these are highly recommended for audiophiles and daily use, but potential buyers should be aware of possible durability and control issues.
Pros
- Exceptional sound quality with clear separation
- Comfortable and secure fit
- Effective noise cancellation without audio degradation
- Impressive battery life up to 7 hours
- Great call quality
Cons
- Unresponsive touch controls
- Volume imbalance after extended use
- Poor customer service for defects
- Bulky design for some users
- ANC not sufficient in very loud environments
Scores
Specifications
| QJF M126 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | s | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Invisible Mini Sleep Earbuds Wireless Bluetooth, 2-in-1 Dual Design for Side Sleepers, Ultra-Low Profile Soft Ear Tips for Small Ears, Noise Blocking Sleep Headphones with Portable Charging Case | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 4.5 hrs | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | Yes★ | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 30 hrs★ | 16 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Waterproof | IPX4 |
Pros & Cons
QJF M126
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong comfort (70th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (68th percentile)
- Strong battery (68th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
Verdict
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 38 specs.