MSI Cubi 5 B0A8 Black 2025

MSI Cubi 5 B0A8 Black 2025

MSI
50 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
MSI
12
HP
91
Business
MSI
44
HP
87
Creator
MSI
21
HP
87
Developer
MSI
47
HP
87
Home Office
MSI
46
HP
87
Workstation
MSI
44
HP
85
Ai Llm
MSI
22
HP
67
Compact
MSI
51
HP
31

Specifications

MSI Cubi 5 B0A8HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i5 1235UAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
12,540
30,931
Cores108
Frequency1.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel Iris Xe GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
2,593
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU850W
Weight1.36 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports58
ThunderboltThunderbolt 40
HDMI1 x HDMI 2.11 x HDMI
DisplayPort1 x DisplayPort Out3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.3
Ethernet2 x RJ-45 (LAN)Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

MSI Cubi 5 B0A8 Black 2025

  • Strong port selection (73rd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average cpu (30th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

MSI Cubi 5 B0A8 Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation