G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill
65 Overall Score
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel
79 Overall Score

Scores

Efficiency
G.Skill
76
Intel
89
Productivity
G.Skill
69
Intel
83
Ai Llm
G.Skill
58
Intel
75
Gaming
G.Skill
61
Intel
74
Server
G.Skill
55
Intel
71
Budget
G.Skill
60
Intel
70

Specifications

G.Skill Trident Z NeoIntel Core Ultra 9 285
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 5Core Ultra 9
Model3600285
CodenameMatisseZen
Classdesktopdesktop
Process7★14
Cores & Clocks
Cores624★
P-cores68★
E-cores—16★
Threads1224★
Base Clock
3,600
3,000
Boost Clock
4,200
5,600
Cache
L2 Cache34★
L3 Cache32★16
Performance
PassMark Multi
17,645
57,909
PassMark Single
2,557
4,909
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR5★
Max Speed
3,600
2,666
Channels2★—
Max Memory32★—
ECC✗✓★
Platform & Power
SocketAMD Socket AM4LGA 1700
PCIe4.05.0
PCIe Lanes1616
TDP6565
Unlocked✓✓

Pros & Cons

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong platform (78th percentile)
  • Strong ai (72nd percentile)
  • Below average affordability (21st percentile)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

  • Strong efficiency (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong platform (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity