AMD EPYC 7401 24-core Socket FT1

AMD EPYC 7401 24-core Socket FT1

AMD
31 Overall Score
vs
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP
30 Overall Score

Scores

Efficiency
AMD
15
HP
59
Server
AMD
37
HP
27
Budget
AMD
17
HP
36
Productivity
AMD
36
HP
26
Ai Llm
AMD
35
HP
22
Gaming
AMD
17
HP
23

Specifications

AMD EPYC 7401HP Celeron N4500
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesEPYCCeleron
Model7401N4500
Codename—Jasper Lake
Classserverlaptop
Process—10★
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★2
P-cores—2★
Threads48★2
Base Clock
2,000
1,100
Boost Clock
3,000
2,800
Cache
L2 Cache—3★
L3 Cache64★4
Performance
PassMark MultiNo data
1,759
PassMark SingleNo data
1,253
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR4
Max Speed
2,666
2,933
Channels8★—
Max Memory
2,048
No data
ECC—✗
Platform & Power
SocketSocket FT1Intel BGA 1338
PCIe3.03.0
PCIe Lanes
128
8
TDP—6★
Max Turbo Power—20★
Unlocked✗✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel UHD Graphics

Pros & Cons

AMD EPYC 7401 24-core Socket FT1

  • Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (30th percentile)
  • Below average single thread (34th percentile)

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

  • Strong efficiency (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average ai (21st percentile)
  • Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
  • Below average single thread (26th percentile)

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - AMD EPYC 7401 wins 8 specs while HP Celeron N4500 wins 8.

AMD EPYC 7401 Better at:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

HP Celeron N4500 Better at:

BudgetGamingEfficiency