AMD EPYC 7401 24-core Socket FT1
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338
Scores
Specifications
| AMD EPYC 7401 | HP Celeron N4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | EPYC | Celeron |
| Model | 7401 | N4500 |
| Codename | — | Jasper Lake |
| Class | server | laptop |
| Process | — | 10★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 2 |
| P-cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | 48★ | 2 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | 64★ | 4 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | No data | |
| PassMark Single | No data | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 8★ | — |
| Max Memory | No data | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | Socket FT1 | Intel BGA 1338 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | ||
| TDP | — | 6★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 20★ |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics |
Pros & Cons
AMD EPYC 7401 24-core Socket FT1
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average multi thread (30th percentile)
- Below average single thread (34th percentile)
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338
- Strong efficiency (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average ai (21st percentile)
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average single thread (26th percentile)
Verdict
Both products are closely matched - AMD EPYC 7401 wins 8 specs while HP Celeron N4500 wins 8.