Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Callsky-Tech Ctab 14 Gray 2025

Callsky-Tech Ctab 14 Gray 2025

Callsky-Tech
47 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
Xiaomi
82
Callsky-Tech
49
Art Design
Xiaomi
80
Callsky-Tech
48
Reading
Xiaomi
79
Callsky-Tech
57
Productivity
Xiaomi
71
Callsky-Tech
41
Student
Xiaomi
69
Callsky-Tech
50
Business
Xiaomi
62
Callsky-Tech
46

Spezifikationen

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779Callsky-Tech Ctab 14
Processor
CPU3 GHzAMD Ryzen 3 1200★
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
6,266
Cores88
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB★8 GB
Storage512 GB★256 GB
Expandable✗✓★
Display
Size11.2"14.1"
Resolution3200 px★—
PanelLCDIPS★
Refresh Rate144 Hz★—
Brightness800 nits★—
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E★Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4★Bluetooth 5.0
USB-C1★—
Cellular✗✓★
Features
Stylus Support✓✓
Stylus Model—Stylus Pen
Fingerprint Reader✓★—
Physical
Weight0.45 kg★0.90 kg
OSHyperOS 2Android 15

Vor- & Nachteile

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile

Callsky-Tech Ctab 14 Gray 2025

  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong storage (75th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
  • Strong ram (68th percentile)
  • Below average cpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average gpu (11th percentile)11th %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135Score pro Dollar
vs
Callsky-Tech Ctab 14 Gray 20250.093Score pro Dollar

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Callsky-Tech Ctab 14 Gray 2025

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 20 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Besser bei:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen