Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

ICONLINK
49 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
Xiaomi
82
ICONLINK
51
Art Design
Xiaomi
80
ICONLINK
39
Reading
Xiaomi
79
ICONLINK
52
Productivity
Xiaomi
71
ICONLINK
32
Student
Xiaomi
69
ICONLINK
45
Business
Xiaomi
62
ICONLINK
38

Spezifikationen

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M
Processor
CPU3 GHzUnisoc
Cores84
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB20 GB
Storage512 GB128 GB
Expandable
Display
Size11.2"10.1"
Resolution3200 px
PanelLCDIPS
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Brightness800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C11
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Physical
Weight0.45 kg0.97 kg
OSHyperOS 2Android 15

Vor- & Nachteile

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

  • Strong ram (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Strong battery (66th percentile)
  • Below average feature (34th percentile)

Preise

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025 is 433 € cheaper (3.9x less).

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135Score pro Dollar
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 20250.331Score pro Dollar

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025 bietet 2.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Besser bei:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen