Aheadthink AHAT81K

Aheadthink AHAT81K

Aheadthink
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
79 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
Aheadthink
24
Xiaomi
82
Art Design
Aheadthink
18
Xiaomi
80
Reading
Aheadthink
23
Xiaomi
79
Productivity
Aheadthink
14
Xiaomi
71
Student
Aheadthink
19
Xiaomi
69
Business
Aheadthink
17
Xiaomi
62

Spezifikationen

Aheadthink AHAT81KXiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Processor
CPU3 GHz
Cores8
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB
Storage512 GB
Expandable
Display
Size11.2"
Resolution3200 px
PanelLCD
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Brightness800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Physical
Weight0.45 kg
OSHyperOS 2

Vor- & Nachteile

Aheadthink AHAT81K

  • Below average feature (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average screen (29th percentile)
  • Below average storage (30th percentile)

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile

Preise

Aheadthink AHAT81K is 453 € cheaper (4.6x less).

Aheadthink AHAT81K0.206Score pro Dollar
vs
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135Score pro Dollar

Aheadthink AHAT81K bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Aheadthink AHAT81K

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Besser bei:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen