OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5"

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5"

OWC
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
98 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Laptop
OWC
21
Kingston
100
Workstation
OWC
25
Kingston
99
Gaming
OWC
18
Kingston
98
Console
OWC
9
Kingston
94
Budget
OWC
62
Kingston
81
Portable
OWC
7
Kingston
26

Spezifikationen

OWC Mercury ElectraKingston SSD
Drive
Capacity
120
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—5★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
500
14,800
Sequential Write (MB/s)Keine Daten
14,000
Random Read (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,200,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
Controller—SM2508
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)Keine Daten
4,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✗

Vor- & Nachteile

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average speed (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile

Preise

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5" is 1.107 € cheaper (31.4x less).

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5"0.800Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.086Score pro Dollar

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5" bietet 9.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

OWC Mercury Electra 120GB SATA III 2.5"

Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Kingston SSD

Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.

Kingston SSD Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen