SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ORICO Y20 256GB SATA III 2.5"

ORICO Y20 256GB SATA III 2.5"

ORICO
33 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
ORICO
10
Workstation
SanDisk
85
ORICO
31
Gaming
SanDisk
85
ORICO
21
Budget
SanDisk
57
ORICO
79
Laptop
SanDisk
66
ORICO
33
Portable
SanDisk
24
ORICO
8

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100ORICO Y20
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
450
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

ORICO Y20 256GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average speed (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

ORICO Y20 Besser bei:

Budget