SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston DC2000B

Kingston DC2000B

Kingston
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Kingston
27
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
40
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Kingston
31
Budget
SanDisk
72
Kingston
26
Laptop
SanDisk
67
Kingston
40
Portable
SanDisk
24
Kingston
9

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston DC2000B
Drive
Capacity
8,000
240
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
Keine Daten
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
Keine Daten
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
175
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Kingston DC2000B

  • Strong endurance (72nd percentile)
  • Strong speed (66th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation