SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung PM981 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung PM981 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
43 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
85
Samsung
16
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
38
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Samsung
33
Budget
SanDisk
57
Samsung
66
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Samsung
45
Portable
SanDisk
23
Samsung
10

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung PM981
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
Keine Daten
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
Keine Daten
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★2
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung PM981 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Samsung PM981 Besser bei:

Budget