SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
41 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Kingston
18
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
37
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Kingston
36
Budget
SanDisk
57
Kingston
72
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Kingston
46
Portable
SanDisk
23
Kingston
11

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston NV1
Drive
Capacity
8,000
500
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
2,100
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,700
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average capacity (27th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Kingston NV1 Besser bei:

Budget