Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Corsair
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston ValueRam
Kingston
55 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W | Kingston ValueRam | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32★ | 52 |
| Timings | 32-40-40-84 | 52-52-52 |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.100000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Kingston ValueRam
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average latency (26th percentile)
Preise
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W0.093Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston ValueRam0.179Score pro Dollar
Kingston ValueRam bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
