Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm

Sigma
98 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon 7084C018

Canon 7084C018

Canon
33 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Sigma
100
Canon
23
Macro
Sigma
96
Canon
12
Budget
Sigma
94
Canon
44
Travel
Sigma
93
Canon
28
Portrait
Sigma
91
Canon
50
Video Cinema
Sigma
91
Canon
32
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
87
Canon
29
Professional
Sigma
84
Canon
26
Street
Sigma
79
Canon
35

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mmCanon 7084C018
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm105 mm
Elements20—
Groups14—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements5★—
Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5—
Min Aperture3.5-6.7f/4-7.1
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountSony E—
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.61 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm★—
Max Magnification1:2★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile

Canon 7084C018

  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports