Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Canon
88
Rokinon
43
Budget
Canon
80
Rokinon
46
Professional
Canon
79
Rokinon
38
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Rokinon
41
Video Cinema
Canon
74
Rokinon
36
Travel
Canon
72
Rokinon
47
Street
Canon
64
Rokinon
50
Macro
Canon
64
Rokinon
34
Portrait
Canon
55
Rokinon
33

Spezifikationen

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mmRokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min15 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm35 mm
Elements167
Groups126
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements2
CoatingAir-Sphere coatingUltra Multi Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.09 kg
Filter Thread82 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMAuto Focus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm350 mm
Max Magnification0.21x0.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (26th percentile)

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports