Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
OM System M.Zuiko PRO V335260BW000 25mm
OM System
75 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | OM System M.Zuiko PRO V335260BW000 25mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | — | 19 |
| Groups | — | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Z Coating Nano |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 300 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:9.09★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
OM System M.Zuiko PRO V335260BW000 25mm
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: OM System M.Zuiko PRO V335260BW000 25mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.