Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 36B965

Sigma 36B965

Sigma
35 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
30
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
60
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
41
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
40
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
16
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
14
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
36
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
27
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
15

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 36B965
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm45 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm45 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 36B965

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports