Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM

Sigma
41 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
38
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
61
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
44
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
51
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
15
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
25
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
45
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
33
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
30

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon Zleica_l
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg2.06 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (79th percentile)
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports