Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

Leica
33 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Leica
37
Portrait
Nikon
89
Leica
39
Street
Nikon
86
Leica
36
Budget
Nikon
86
Leica
28
Macro
Nikon
85
Leica
22
Landscape
Nikon
83
Leica
28
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Leica
34
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Leica
26
Travel
Nikon
75
Leica
27

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm21 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm21 mm
Elements136
Groups114
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements34
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountNikon ZLeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread67 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm700 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.0010347222

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports