Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Art 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM 12-24mm

Sigma Art 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM 12-24mm

Sigma
37 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
50
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
36
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
38
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
40
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
44
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
51
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
39
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
41
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
39

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Art 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM 12-24mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm24 mm
Elements1316
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements36
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.15 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorHSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm240 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.2x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Art 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM 12-24mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports