Sigma 316969

Sigma 316969

Sigma
52 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Nikon
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
60
Nikon
95
Portrait
Sigma
56
Nikon
90
Street
Sigma
50
Nikon
87
Budget
Sigma
49
Nikon
87
Macro
Sigma
60
Nikon
85
Video Cinema
Sigma
57
Nikon
83
Landscape
Sigma
48
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
45
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
36
Nikon
74

Spezifikationen

Sigma 316969Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements1713
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements3
CoatingSuper Multilayer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades139
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.29 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHigh-Response Linear ActuatorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance400 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:6.21:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 316969

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports