Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Ricoh
72 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Street
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 40 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 17 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 0 | 2★ |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Nano Crystal Coat |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | GR | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg★ | 0.68 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | AF híbrido | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | 2.5 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 120 mm★ | 290 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.