Thypoch TP-S35RF-SR

Thypoch TP-S35RF-SR

Thypoch
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Thypoch
40
Nikon
95
Portrait
Thypoch
42
Nikon
89
Street
Thypoch
39
Nikon
86
Budget
Thypoch
35
Nikon
86
Macro
Thypoch
44
Nikon
85
Landscape
Thypoch
32
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Thypoch
37
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Thypoch
26
Nikon
78
Travel
Thypoch
31
Nikon
75

Spezifikationen

Thypoch TP-S35RF-SRNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements913
Groups511
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements3
Coatingmulti-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades149
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.30 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance457 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:1.41:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Thypoch TP-S35RF-SR

  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Thypoch TP-S35RF-SR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen