Panasonic LUMIX S S-R1840 40mm
Panasonic
59 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Macro
Landscape
Portrait
Budget
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Spezifikationen
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R1840 40mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 40 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 8 | — |
| Groups | 7 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 22-32★ | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.57★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R1840 40mm
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong optical (70th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R1840 40mm
Scores 59 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.