Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mm

Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mm

Viltrox
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Viltrox
68
Sony
94
Budget
Viltrox
68
Sony
91
Street
Viltrox
76
Sony
90
Video Cinema
Viltrox
58
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sony
84
Landscape
Viltrox
70
Sony
79
Portrait
Viltrox
59
Sony
77
Professional
Viltrox
65
Sony
77
Macro
Viltrox
65
Sony
68

Spezifikationen

Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min14 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max14 mm50 mm
Elements129
Groups98
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements4★1
CoatingHD multilayer nano coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.17 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread58 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance130 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification0.23x★0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mm0.303Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.405Score pro Dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox Air AF 14/4.0 FE 14mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen