Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm

Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm

Canon
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Canon
94
Nikon
68
Budget
Canon
80
Nikon
86
Video Cinema
Canon
86
Nikon
71
Professional
Canon
85
Nikon
66
Wildlife Sports
Canon
82
Nikon
65
Portrait
Canon
55
Nikon
79
Travel
Canon
77
Nikon
71
Street
Canon
67
Nikon
75
Macro
Canon
73
Nikon
73

Spezifikationen

Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mmNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min14 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm85 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements32
CoatingSWC and ASCSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFNikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.54 kg0.48 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMAF-S
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance201 mm380 mm
Max Magnification0.38x

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Preise

Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 22 specs.

Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm Besser bei:

TravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetPortrait

Auch in Betracht ziehen