Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

Leitz Cine
27 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Leitz Cine
16
Portrait
Sigma
90
Leitz Cine
17
Street
Sigma
88
Leitz Cine
15
Budget
Sigma
85
Leitz Cine
29
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Leitz Cine
19
Macro
Sigma
83
Leitz Cine
31
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Leitz Cine
14
Landscape
Sigma
77
Leitz Cine
22
Travel
Sigma
75
Leitz Cine
25

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmLeitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm73 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T22
Min Aperturef/2.8T2.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.77 kg
Filter Thread72 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm305 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

  • Strong versatility (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports