Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

TTArtisan
50 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
TTArtisan
41
Portrait
Sigma
90
TTArtisan
44
Street
Sigma
88
TTArtisan
44
Budget
Sigma
85
TTArtisan
45
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
TTArtisan
36
Macro
Sigma
83
TTArtisan
68
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
TTArtisan
31
Landscape
Sigma
77
TTArtisan
49
Travel
Sigma
75
TTArtisan
38

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmTTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm10 mm
Elements1613
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements50
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingHD multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread72 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.552:1

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports