Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR 50mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR 50mm

Nikon
69 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
75
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
47
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
62
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
70
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
76
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
83
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
61
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
76
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
77

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR 50mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements1612
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm150 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.24x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR 50mm

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR 50mm Besser bei:

TravelLandscape