Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujifilm
62 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Fujifilm
76
Portrait
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
75
Street
Sigma
88
Fujifilm
66
Budget
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
52
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
71
Macro
Sigma
83
Fujifilm
60
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
62
Landscape
Sigma
77
Fujifilm
52
Travel
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
50

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmFujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR 63mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm63 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm63 mm
Elements1610
Groups118
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm G
Formatfull-framemedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread72 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR 63mm

  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports