Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

Sigma
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
59
Nikon
94
Portrait
Sigma
46
Nikon
88
Budget
Sigma
44
Nikon
87
Street
Sigma
45
Nikon
87
Macro
Sigma
53
Nikon
84
Landscape
Sigma
55
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
56
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
57
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
37
Nikon
71

Spezifikationen

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min600 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max600 mm28 mm
Elements2813
Groups2111
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/22f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades139
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.81 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance2.80 m190 mm
Max Magnification1:61:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports