Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm
Tamron
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Nikon
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Portrait
Street
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm | Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 85 mm |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon F |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg★ | 0.48 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping motor★ | AF-S |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 18 mm★ | 380 mm |
Vor- & Nachteile
Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
- Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
Preise
Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm0.151Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.203Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 18 specs.
