Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
Tamron
55 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (70th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Preise
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm0.128Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.411Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 3.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
