Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 55-200mm

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 55-200mm

Canon
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Canon
70
Sigma
98
Portrait
Canon
69
Sigma
90
Street
Canon
85
Sigma
88
Budget
Canon
73
Sigma
85
Video Cinema
Canon
72
Sigma
85
Macro
Canon
62
Sigma
83
Travel
Canon
80
Sigma
75
Wildlife Sports
Canon
74
Sigma
80
Landscape
Canon
69
Sigma
77

Spezifikationen

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 55-200mmSigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min55 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm28 mm
Elements1716
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements15
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/2.8
Min Aperture4.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EF-MSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.09 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread52 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.00 m250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 55-200mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 55-200mm Besser bei:

Travel

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports